Chapter 1474 This Is What I Said

Recently, many people on the Internet are attacking me, saying that I have disturbed the industry order, so what is the industry order?

Industry order, I think, should include technology market order, talent market order, business market order, investment development order and so on. . For more latest chapters visit: ШЩЩ.⑦⑨.сОМ. I'm not an expert, and I can't say those professional terms. Today, I only talk about my views from the perspective of consumers.

As a consumer of it products, I take the most intuitive computer as an example. I want to buy a computer, there are two ways to order online and buy it in a physical store.

And to use a computer, in addition to buying the computer, I have to install the software I need to use.

So I plan to buy a computer. The 'spend' fee is 6,000 yuan RMB, and I like a computer priced at 5,999 yuan, but when I actually buy it, the 'spend' fee will be higher than this.

Because I want to install software, the most basic, I want to install the system. There are two mainstream options here, one is Lianxiang Yinshan's xos CD and Microsoft's Vista CD.

The former retails for 499 yuan RMB, if it is a pre-installed system, then the price should be 199 yuan. And what about Microsoft? The retail price is several times that, even if it is a pre-installed system, the price is close to 1,000 yuan.

This is not counting the fact that you need to buy a desktop computer. Generally, you need a "plug-in" cable board, network cables, and network installation. These related products are another sum of money.

So the money we actually 'spend' to buy a computer = computer cost + software price + store cost + accessories price + profit

What should be the real cost of a computer here? How much profit? Who made the biggest profit?

The rent of the shop, the profit of the agent, the profit of the PC manufacturer, the profit of the software manufacturer... There are too many people who share money.

And who has the highest profit margin? Microsoft.

Microsoft is known as R&D Vista and has invested tens of billions of dollars, but where did these tens of billions of dollars come from? The profit they earned from selling the XP system was enough to develop Vista and XP more than a dozen times!

Where does Bill Gates' wealth come from, it's all Microsoft. Where is my wealth? From a variety of investments, the profits from it investments are not the bulk of all my income.

I just invest in a lot of industries, each of which can bring a little profit in the future. Taken together, my income has increased a lot.

Having said that, as consumers, we all want to buy our favorite products at lower prices. But as a production and sales side, they hope that the profit is high enough.

How to form a balance between the two, I think it is best to operate with the concept of a supermarket. Simply put, it is small profits but quick turnover.

I want to create a computer industry with small profits but quick turnover. Whether it is hardware or software, manufacturers must have profits, but the profit per product should not be so high.

Now I have invested in various hardware accessories, software, and PC manufacturers, just to give consumers a reasonable price.

And the result? I touched the interests of those manufacturers, they united, attacked me, slandered me, and said that I disrupted the industry order?

To maintain high profits, even if the product cannot be sold, it will not be sold at a reduced price. Is this their order?

Defining computers as high-end electronics, not ordinary household appliances, is that their order?

Some people cut prices and give profits to consumers, is it a violation of order?

If these are their so-called industry orders, then I would say that none of the companies I invest in will abide by these "orders"!

They "turned" the order into a shackle, and wanted to lock up other companies and profits, and let consumers follow them and keep consumers in the dark.

I will break this shackle, break the order, and re-establish a new and reasonable order!

Many people once took Bill Gates as a role model, dropped out of school and established a huge Microsoft empire,

But if there was no Paul Allen, how could it have been possible with Bill Gates?

And many people may not know, Bill Gates' mother, who was a friend of the chairman and CEO of ibm, and they worked together, she was an executive of an intercontinental bank.

This is why Bill Gates' original software was sold to ibm, and why Microsoft's dos was promoted by ibm and became the industry standard with the help of ibm.

Going to school and doing business are not in conflict in themselves. I finished my studies so today I can surpass Bill Gates in wealth.

Those who regard dropping out of school as the golden "jade" rule and think that the world waits for no one are all "blinded" by this story. I don't deny that Bill Gates is excellent, but also don't forget that Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer, who started the business with him, would not have Microsoft without their contributions and the help of Bill's mother. of today.

What I want to say is that Bill Gates is not a good role model, our young people should never learn, unless your mother also has an unparalleled background.

Let's talk about Intel, which has always claimed that its products are the best in the world, but under the witness of hundreds of media around the world, their products were completely defeated by AMD.

We should be clear that for most standard products, the larger the output, the lower the cost. However, the output of Intel is obviously higher than that of Chaowei, and the 'sex' performance is the same as that of Chaowei, or even not as good as Chaowei, but the price is much higher.

Then relatively speaking, the profit of Intel is much higher.

The price of Chaowei at this time can guarantee normal profits. It is said that the profits of Intel should be higher at the same price. If not, then there are only two possibilities.

The first one, Intel lied. The second, the technology of Intel, is not as good as Chaowei. As for which one, I'm also curious.

If Intel is lying, then their profits are windfall profits. If Intel did not lie, then their technology research and development is indeed inferior to AMD.

Here I would like to ask the representative of Intel, which of my guesses is correct? Or is there a third possibility, a combination of both?

There are also those pc manufacturers who keep attacking the Lianxiang Group, why, because the 'cost-effectiveness' of their products is far inferior to Lianxiang's models. Their 10,000-yuan laptops are less "sexy" than the 8,000-yuan laptops.

They didn't want to lower their selling price, but asked Lianxiang Group to raise the selling price. Frankly speaking, Lianxiang Group's selling price has increased, although sales may be reduced, but the profit per product has increased by a large margin, and Lianxiang Group may make more money.

But we didn't have that choice. We chose to let more consumers buy computers at reasonable prices. We wanted to make computers an ordinary household product, not a so-called high-end electronic product.

These are what I want to say today, the conscience of a conscientious entrepreneur!

...