Chapter 1164: No. 52 "Showing Off Wealth"

The reason why they were stunned was that in the video, the two best-selling joint venture SUVs in China were directly scrapped in the collision with the Song. It looked like a piece was missing, the wheels were gone, and the parts of the engine compartment were scattered everywhere.

The two Songs looked much better. The front of the car was damaged, but it was not serious. It looked like it could be repaired and used.

Of course, the A-pillars of the four cars were not deformed, and the airbags were all deployed.

Such a sharp contrast is obvious at a glance. These two joint venture SUVs collapsed directly in the minds of many people.

Because it goes without saying that the two joint venture cars can be replaced with new cars after such a collision. After all, the engine compartment is gone, and the cost of repair is not as good as buying a new one.

The Song is different. The main parts in the engine compartment did not fly at all, and it can be repaired.

Many people couldn't sit still after seeing this, and began to run to the comment area to whitewash and curse.

But the video was not over yet, No. 58 and the staff on the scene began to measure the thickness and material of the vehicle's anti-collision steel beam.

"CrV's front anti-collision beam uses a double-layer rolled steel plate structure.

Although this structure has a certain strength, its hardness and strength are inferior to some anti-collision steel beams made of high-strength steel or aluminum alloy.

The thickness of its front anti-collision beam is about 1.6 mm.

RAV's front anti-collision steel beam uses ordinary steel with a thickness of 1.8. Needless to say, ordinary steel plates have even worse hardness and strength.

Let's take a look at Song's anti-collision steel beam, which is made of hot-formed steel, 2 mm thick, and can cover 79.57% of the front of the car.

But we can see that its cross-section is " The structure is in the shape of a Chinese character "目", and the two cross beams in the middle are curved. I guess it should play a role in buffering and absorbing energy in actual collisions.

But we did not see what the structures of the two joint venture cars were like in this regard, because they were all completely unrecognizable.

So why is the damage to the front of the Song far less than that of the two joint venture cars when the thickness of the anti-collision steel beam is not much different from that of the two joint venture cars?

In fact, the main reason is the different materials used.

These three cars use rolled steel plates, ordinary steel plates and hot-formed steel respectively.

The yield strength of common rolled steel plates can be around 200MPa to 500MPa, and the tensile strength is around 300MPa to 700MPa.

The yield strength of ordinary carbon structural steel plates is around 200MPa to 300MPa, and the tensile strength is around 370MPa to 500MPa About.

The yield strength of hot-formed steel can reach more than 1500MPa, and the tensile strength exceeds 2000MPa.

This is why the thickness is similar, but there is such a big difference in anti-collision ability.

Some people may ask why hot-formed steel is not used. It is very simple. Of course, it is because of cost.

The cost of ordinary steel plates is lower than that of rolled steel plates, and these two materials are much lower than the cost of hot-formed steel.

The production process of hot-formed steel is complicated, requiring special processes such as high-temperature heating and rapid cooling, resulting in high costs.

Moreover, the welding performance of hot-formed steel is relatively poor, and special welding methods and processes are required, which increases production costs and technical difficulties.

One is that the forming of hot-formed steel requires special molds and equipment, and the production process requirements are high, which limits its application in some small car manufacturers.

I really didn't expect that Song, which is priced tens of thousands lower than the two joint venture cars, not only uses materials that are far better than them, but also has a thickness that is better than them. It can be said that the materials are very sincere.........."

In the video, No. 58 only showed the collision results, analyzed the materials used and the cost of materials, etc., but still did not draw any conclusions.

But anyone with a discerning eye knows that Song is far better than the other two SUVs in terms of safety performance.

The comment section is different. It can be said that this video on No. 58 has stirred up a hornet's nest.

"I feel that this video is specifically designed to criticize joint venture cars. This blogger must have received money from the flower-growing companies."

"I think so too. How can a collision test be conducted like this?"

"This video is bullshit. What is a safety test? The driver in the cockpit was not injured. That's enough."

"Yes, yes, yes, in terms of protecting the driver and passengers, the joint venture car is qualified, and the front of the car is more friendly to pedestrians and non-motor vehicles."

"This blogger must have received money from the flower-growing companies. He actually came out to criticize joint venture cars like this. Let's put it this way, the flower-growing companies can't catch up with their technology even if they make cars for another 20 years."

Of course, there are also people who come out to defend the injustice and support the blogger.

"I'm anxious, these people are anxious, the blogger didn't give any definition, he didn't say the safety of joint venture cars is worse than that of domestic cars? Why do you put yourself in it?"

"Haha, this is self-incriminating, hey, if I were a car company, I would be ashamed to have fans like you, this is not to whitewash, but to make things worse."

"Haha, I admit that many of the craftsmanship of joint venture cars cannot be matched by domestic cars, but the materials used in this Song car are absolutely sincere!"

However, there are more attacks on the blogger in the comment area, and the final unanimous statement is that the blogger was paid, otherwise how could he have the money to do such a large evaluation, and it would cost 600,000 or 700,000 yuan to destroy several cars at a time.

But what is unexpected is that less than two hours after this video was uploaded, "52 Car Vision" uploaded another video, but this is a short video, this short video is in the background of the home, and it is still moving.

"I just checked the background data, the number of views of this video has exploded, but I looked at the comments area, and everyone said that I received money from the flower grower, otherwise how could I afford such an expensive review.

I admit that I used to work at the flower grower, but I resigned last year, because work is a kind of life experience and a seasoning for me.

Hehe, let me put it this way, first of all, I declare that I am not showing off, I just want to fight back against the haters.

Because I am lucky, although I was not born in a wealthy family, I have never lacked money since I was a child, so spending hundreds of thousands of yuan to do reviews is nothing to me!"

In this video, the luxury of this guy's home is indeed not comparable to that of ordinary people, and the furniture in the home is expensive at a glance.

And when No. 52 accidentally took a photo of the parking lot, people kept exclaiming, because there were several sports cars parked underneath.

At the end of the video, this guy also showed off the balance of another bank card on his phone, which was 8 digits.

It can be said that this video on No. 52 directly and forcefully hit back at many people who said in the comment area that he collected money from the seed and flower family, otherwise he could not afford such a review.

It made the person who said such a thing become a clown.

PS: The typo will be updated first and corrected later.