Chapter 1017 The Future of the Virtual World

The barrage in the live broadcast room has been swiped by the overwhelming 666, and the audience at the scene are all dumbfounded.

It can be said that the vast majority of people present did not expect that Chen Mo would come up with this rhetoric.

Professor Xu's expression was very excited. Obviously, he wanted to pat the table and say it was "nonsense", but he raised his hand, but couldn't pat it down.

The other two guests also looked at each other, obviously their brains were running fast to refute this statement, but they were short of words for a while.

Is there something wrong with what Chen Mo said?

Something went wrong!

At least the first reaction of the other guest upon hearing Chen Mo's words was, isn't this nonsense?

But after smoothing the logic from beginning to end, it seems to be quite complete...

The examples cited by Chen Mo, including Mike's sarcastic words on capitalism, words on police cars, FIB-related plots, etc., are indeed there in GTA, and it is impossible for Chen Mo to openly spread rumors in the public eye. Since there are these elements, Chen Mo said that GTA is exposing the ugliness of capitalism, which seems to be very logical in terms of logic.

Moreover, simply grasping the violent elements of GTA to talk about things is actually not very tenable.

When a carrier presents the plot with the main goal of "exposure" and "criticism", the excessive beautification of the scene will greatly reduce the criticism. To put it simply, like some essays about beheading in the old society, ignorant people use the blood of revolutionaries to dip human blood into steamed buns in an attempt to cure diseases. This plot is actually quite bloody, even more bloody than most movies and TV dramas. The dead are much bloodier.

However, if you want to eliminate this bloody and violent influence and over-beautify this plot, the "critical" effect it aims to achieve will not exist.

If you force all similar themes to be like fairy tales, it will only make people feel extremely false, and eventually become complete cultural garbage.

These people's doubts about GTA mainly focus on its "violent" appearance, while Chen Mo raised the issue to a higher level of "spiritual connotation", so he directly raised the topic and formed a A "dimensionality reduction strike".

And the key to this is that GTA must have enough rich connotations.

GTA really has it.

Is it a game that encourages crime? Not really.

Most people just scratch the surface and feel that GTA encourages everyone to commit crimes, which is not true.

GTA does not encourage crime, nor does it induce players to kill indiscriminately or abuse them. It is not the bloody rivers and lakes that most people think, nor is it the unrestrained and happy revenge that teenagers yearn for, but the shackles that are getting tighter and tighter. It tells the sadness of being played by the invisible enemy after defeating the visible enemy again and again.

In the world of GTA, there has never been a false way of marrying Bai Fumei and reaching the pinnacle of life by committing a crime, but constantly being betrayed by one's own friends, or betraying one's friends, and having to temporarily bow to the more powerful evil forces , to be a biting dog for the beasts of the FIB.

Those stories that seem to stimulate the hormones of players are actually just constantly wiping their butts for others and completing one task after another, but they can never redeem their freedom from FIB.

The protagonist of the previous work may die like a wild dog in the next work, and no one cares about his life or death.

When first entering the GTA world, many people may indulge in the thrill of killing and looting, but as the plot deepens, players feel the joys and sorrows of the protagonist, and will find that everyone in the story, even those small supporting characters , also have their own sorrows. And the deeper exposure of the current situation of the whole society derived from this is the key to making GTA different from a cool game and a masterpiece.

...

The debate on "Today's Current Affairs Debate" is still going on, but the trend on the Internet has completely turned to Chen Mo's side.

Of course, Chen Mo's remarks can't conquer everyone. For people like Professor Xu and Chen Baiyou, the position that "violent games will inevitably lead to crimes" has been preset in their brains. Explain to them again. It is impossible to convince more.

But of course Chen Mo's remarks were not for the three dissenting guests, but for all the audience in front of the TV and computer who were paying attention to this hot topic.

What Chen Mo wants is public opinion's support for GTA, or at least no objection, what he wants is the tolerance and understanding of the entire social environment for the development of games, especially virtual games.

In the second half of the show, several dissenting guests and the audience were still trying to refute Chen Mo's statement, but Chen Mo responded one by one, completely taking the initiative in the scene.

At the end of the show, Hu Yue asked Chen Mo: "I am very grateful to Mr. Chen for being able to participate in the "Today's Debate on Current Affairs" today to give an official explanation of the GTA game, which also allows us to better understand the true meaning of the game. Finally, I also There is a question, which was raised by a live audience just now, traditional violent games may not have much impact, but as a next-generation VR, the immersion and realism of the matrix game cabin are far superior to traditional PC and mobile games. Will it have a more serious impact?"

Chen Mo did not answer directly, but instead asked: "Excuse me, everyone, what do you think the future of virtual reality technology is?"

Hu Yue was taken aback: "The future? I think the future should be closer and closer to the real world."

Chen Mo nodded: "Yes, the so-called virtual reality focuses on 'reality'. Whether some people are willing to admit it or not, the ultimate form of virtual reality will be a perfect reproduction of reality, even beyond reality. In the future, we will What kind of virtual reality world will we create? Is it a 'paradise' where everyone lives and works without any crime?"

"I'm sorry, although this is a good wish, it may only exist in the unrealistic thoughts of a very small number of people. Judging from the current literary and artistic works, whether it is movies, TV series, comics or games, similar false pictures Almost non-existent. If you don't believe it, think about it, is there a hit movie or a best-selling book about 'everyone lives and works happily'. I think there is such a scene only in heaven."

"Why? Because the vast majority of people don't like this kind of falsehood."

"Virtual reality will develop into the future, and it will inevitably be diverse, there are truth, goodness and beauty, as well as falsehood and ugliness. Positive and negative, these are two sides of a coin. If all negative things are eliminated, positive things will appear false, and the whole world will become pale. Powerlessness. Negative things are there to inspire people to yearn for good things, so that they can better understand what is good."

"So, will the violent elements of next-generation VR have a more serious impact? My answer is, no. Not only will it not, but this is the only way for virtual reality, and the future virtual world is an all-encompassing The world, as for what is good and what is bad, only the most players have the right to judge."

Please remember this book's first domain name: . 4 novel network mobile version reading website: