1717 All-Round Brilliant
Remember in one second [End of the God Station] Mobile phone user input address: m.xinwanben.com
"Variety" magazine, one hundred percent.
The New York Times, one hundred percent.
Los Angeles Times, one hundred percent.
The praise frenzy of the three top authoritative media has pushed the "Boom Drummer" to the peak of praise; but it is even more incredible that all the discussion points have been put on Renly, and Renly has been promoted to the highest praise. The title of "young actors of the yth century" can be stripped away, and they have officially entered the ranks of Hollywood's top hall-level actors.
But...is this a compliment or a slander?
Since including egot, Renly has always been on the cusp of the storm, and now the "Boom Drummer" has further promoted the evolution of this divisive feedback speech, and no one can say whether this is a good thing or a bad thing. Maybe things will gradually become clear after "Boom Drummer" officially landed in theaters, but now, everything is still unknown.
At least, The Hollywood Reporter has joined the ranks.
In the Hollywood industry, Michael Phillips is a staunch "Renly supporter", and he has never concealed his admiration and love for Renly, and he will take it seriously in almost every work that Renly has appeared in. Really watched, and gave pertinent opinions and professional film reviews - so far, all of them have been positive.
Of course, this is not unusual.
Because the overall trend of Renly's works is like this, each work can be called a masterpiece, even the most controversial "detachment" so far has a group of steadfast supporters, and it is precisely because of this that social network media Only then did a large number of sunspots complain about Renly and oppose Renly.
But Michael is slightly different. As a professional writer for The Hollywood Reporter, he is the closest film critic to the Pulitzer Prize after Roger Ebert. It is also necessary to remain relatively objective and neutral to ensure the authority and professionalism of the journal.
From this perspective, "The Hollywood Reporter" and "Variety" are more similar.
Against such a background, Michael's support and praise are really invaluable.
Michael had no reason to miss the official premiere of "The Burst Drummer" at Sundance. In fact, Michael had already come to Park City earlier than the frenzy of the symposium. Compared with the frenzy of the awards season, Sundance Sri Lanka's thirtieth anniversary celebration is obviously much more interesting.
After attending the premiere for the first time, Michael did not write a film review immediately, but quietly waited for the precipitation of his thoughts, repeatedly recalled the details of the film, and then wrote a film review. As a result, the "Hollywood Reporter" comment fell behind other media in terms of timeliness.
"It's a unique style of film, and if the audience feels violated or hurt, and they feel anger and discomfort, then that's proof that Damien Chazelle succeeded because that's what he expected.
'Breaking Drummer' presents the opposite of 'Let's collectively put on a show', the 21st century entertainment-to-death thought that everyone enjoys, and presents art in a serious and ruthless, bloody and paranoid, cruel and rude way. The self-torture in the process of breaking through shows the other side of art and entertainment in an unconventional way.
It's also a 'show', but the show of 'Crackling Drummer' is obviously not a 'Sing in the Rain'.
We all know that Van Gogh cut off his ears, Picasso went blind in his later years, and Hemingway ended his life with a shotgun, but we are not geniuses or artists, and we still can't understand how much they endured on the road of art Pain and torture, through this film, maybe we can get a glimpse of the tip of the iceberg.
Maybe you're going to hate this work deeply, maybe you're going to get severe heartburn, maybe you're going to feel violated, it doesn't matter because we're all ordinary people and we'll never understand The world of artists, their inspirations and talents is an unsolved mystery, and all we need to do is become a loyal audience and peer into the world behind art.
The film presents three different perspectives, ordinary people who know nothing about art, artists who are eager to make breakthroughs in the field of art but lack talent after all, and genius artists who truly have talent and become gold. A new world of artistic creation has emerged, and then all the focus is placed on the guidance and breakthrough of the latter two, and the chemical reaction of artistic creation is presented in the form of confrontation, which eventually evolves into the sound of deafening drums. Hit the eardrums of every audience member.
Undoubtedly, the performance of the latter two also became the core of the whole film, Simmons and Hall, Hall and Simmons, these two actors did their job well.
One is strong, the other is delicate, the other is flamboyant, the other is restrained, the other is explosive, and the other is upgraded. In the constant transition of advance, retreat, attack and defense, the two characters continue to circle and rise, and the sparks burst out little by little, making the performances. It becomes an art, and watching the performance becomes a pleasure.
Simmons put on a blockbuster performance that was unquestionably the driving force behind the film's continued, and the best performance of his career - six years ago, in the Oscar-nominated 'Juno' ', but his presence has all but disappeared under Ellen Page's light, to this day.
As for Hall, he put on a career-high breakout performance, and just as Andrew Neiman follows in the footsteps of legendary drummer Buddy Ritchie in the movie, he has also managed to rank among the best in film history, with the
A series of brilliant names on a par, his performance gave Andrew the soul, the jazz soul, and the whole movie.
For many viewers, the most impressive part of the film is still in the final scene. Renly Hall's eyes, like works like 'Crazy in Love', 'Transcendence', 'Drunken Country Ballad', etc. The joy and happiness of breaking the cocoon into a butterfly in the depths burst into light, and the brilliance lit up the entire screen in an instant, which really brought a baptism to the soul.
But personally, my favorite scene is the hug between Andrew and his father before the final climax/climax - the moment of fragility and the strength that stifles weakness, bursting endlessly between a change of eyes Strength, taking advantage of the trend, pulls up all the previous foreshadowings, and the succession and transformation have come to the end, heralding the arrival of the end.
The power of the eyes, under the interpretation of Renly Hall, is like the combination of light and shadow, composition, editing and lens, which fully burst out the charm of the film, who can refuse it? "
As expected, Michael put almost all his brushstrokes on Renly, without stinging his fanaticism, and once again dedicated all the praise to Renly, although Simmons and Damien are still in the film review. An important component, but Renly remains the top priority.
One hundred percent.
Michael had his own verdict, too, with a third straight installment of the highest accolades, truly propelling Renly's career to new heights.
Such an achievement can also be regarded as one of the top super treatment in the whole of Hollywood. Although the comprehensive evaluation of the media is only one of the many criteria for judging the success of a work, it can at least prove that the authoritative recognition of the professional media is absolutely Unbelievable high treatment.
So far, the four authoritative media have all been in place, and they have all given full marks.
"Los Angeles Times" and "New York Times" represent the leading leaders of integrated media on both sides of the strait, while "Variety" and "Hollywood Reporter" represent professional and authoritative media whose art culture is rooted in Hollywood on both sides of the strait. can represent the mainstream view.
In the field of art, authoritative media does not mean authoritative opinions, on the contrary, the authoritative opinions of many independent media can win more recognition; but authoritative media can bring more influence, and then produce more chain effects, which is... Countless commercial films are expected to be treated before their release, and independent films will not refuse more exposure and win more potential opportunities for their own distribution.
It's just that "Booming Drummer" really doesn't need more attention. Now the attention has been seriously overheated. The premiere has just ended, and the discussion on social networks has almost surpassed that of "Gravity" and "Drunken Country Ballads". "Two major works nominated for Oscar nominations.
The four authoritative media all gave full marks. This is not the first time nor the last time, but it has created unimaginable waves at such a critical and sensitive moment.
Official decision: The "cooling" haze that hangs over Renly's head is finally starting to dissipate!
But at present, this has triggered more backlash from the general public, because they did not see the "Boom Drummer", and in the malicious imagination of speculation and speculation, they just rejected Renly more and more.
Entering the hall and being promoted to the altar at the age of twenty-four, Ren Li is still too young, and the thorny road in front of him is far beyond imagination. Even if there are works to open the way, it is still not that easy. It is conceivable that the release of "Exploding Drummer" will face more and greater pressure, depending on whether the quality of the work is excellent.
At least for now, the pursuit and praise seem to be nothing more than a hot carnival feast for the media.
However, in addition to the four authoritative media, the word of mouth of "Boom Drummer" also showed a blowout attitude! That's how the "Sundance Breakout of the Year" appeared.
Among the first batch of 24 media reviews after the premiere of "Boom Drummer", the works were all highly praised, with no negative or medium reviews, all of which were positive! This has also become the first outstanding work with "zero negative reviews" or even "zero middle reviews" since its unveiling at Sundance this year. Even "Vanity Fair", which disliked this work the least, gave it 80 points.
Eighty points, which is the lowest score for the first batch of comments, this small detail can see the frenzy of praise for "Boom Drummer".
Support (end this site) and share this site with those who need it! Can't find the book, please leave a message!