Chapter 1061 1061 Strong Contrast
One is attracting attention, the other is the door; one is the gathering of stars, the other is withering in front of the door; one is the prosperous center, and the other is the remote mountainous area.
The comparison between the Golden Globes and Sundance is almost incomparable. It's not mainstream. No one will ever compare the two together.
But this time is different.
The Golden Globes were completely stole the show by Sundance, just because of a Hugo.
The 52nd Golden Globe Awards actually has a lot to watch. For example, there are many excellent works this year. Unlike last year's "Schindler's List", the ability of other competitors is slightly inferior. Almost all works this year have Absolute strength, although it is said that "Forrest Gump" benefits from the rendering of the American dream, it seems to have a higher voice, but the advantages are not obvious. The "Pulp Fiction", the core of the independent film storm that turned out, is the biggest rule breaker. Therefore, the trend of the final award results is completely incomprehensible, which is also the greatest charm of the awards ceremony.
For example, this year's strong players are like clouds. Just the competition for the best actor in the drama category has gathered five important topics: Hugo, Brad Pitt, Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, and Morgan Freeman. Competitors with topics, strength and strength, and sparks and sparks, the phrase "no one will win" was born for this year.
Therefore, when the Golden Globe Awards ceremony came to an end, both the organizer and NBC, including the guests present, had absolute confidence that this would be the most lively and attractive event.
"Forrest Gump" finally won the fierce battle and won three awards for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor in a Drama.
This caused a huge controversy in an instant. The first was the competition for the best picture in the drama category. It is generally believed that "Pulp Fiction" is more groundbreaking in terms of artistic value and shooting innovation, and is more worthy of recognition, but the result was lost to As the American Dream represents "Forrest Gump", many media have shouted the slogan "'Citizen Kane'-style failure", expressing their dissatisfaction with the winning results in this way.
But objectively speaking, "Forrest Gump" is still loved by the media, otherwise the Hollywood Foreign Press Association would not be so bold in awarding it an award. Therefore, although it is controversial, most of the media still agree with this result.
The real controversy still comes from the best actor in the drama category. Tom Hanks relied on "Forrest Gump" to complete the best actor title. It's not that Tom's performance is not good enough. In fact, Tom's performance of Forrest Gump is admirable. It is delicate and simple, and it shows the depth of the character with different voices. It really makes people applaud; but the problem is, Is Tom's performance really good enough to make him the best actor again? And still beat four formidable competitors.
Among the contenders for the best actor in the drama category, except for Brad's slightly inferior strength - he is more shortlisted by topicality. It is generally believed that another actor in "The Years of Love", Ai Dan is more commendable than Brad; the other three actors all have the strength to beat Tom.
Whether it's Paul or Morgan, they've already gained multiple recognitions for a long time. Their performances this time are definitely not weak, and in terms of strength and performance alone, their difficulty is definitely not inferior to Tom's.
What's more special is that Hugo's performance in "Pulp Fiction" is far underestimated. Although there is a Cannes actor in hand, people's greatest feeling about "Pulp Fiction" is Quentin Tarantino's. Talent, followed by Hugo's performance; but in fact, Hugo's performance is delicate and deep enough, funny but not exaggerated, black humor is outlined in every gesture, and the feeling of flowing clouds and flowing water with the same people and drama runs through it, which is definitely let People applauded. Moreover, Hugo's performance breakthrough is not less difficult than Tom's role.
From this point of view, Tom has enough strength, but it is not the time to win the best actor again. On the contrary, it is more convincing to award the award to Hugo or Paul or Morgan. Even if Morgan's "The Shawshank Redemption" is still underrated by critics at this time, Hugo and Paul would be better choices.
Such a controversy immediately sparked a heated discussion after the award was awarded, and I believe this debate will continue until the Oscars debut.
In addition to "Forrest Gump", the other big winner is "The Lion King", which won the best picture in the musical comedy category, as well as the best film score and the best original song, a total of three The trophy was recorded, and it was tied with "Forrest Gump". The art of dividing the cake in the Golden Globes has been revealed in the early 1990s.
The Best Actor in a Musical Comedy was won by Hugh Grant by relying on "Four Weddings and a Funeral". trophy, only to be snubbed by this romantic comedy from the British Isles.
The drama queen belongs to Jessica Lange of "Blue. Sky", and the musical comedy queen also broke out, and was won by Jamie Lee Curtis by relying on "True Lies" , Andie McDowell of "Four Weddings and a Funeral" and Emma Thompson of "Little Guy" regrettably lost.
In the competition for Best Supporting Actor, Hugo's friend Kevin Bacon relied on "The. River. Wild" and failed to win, losing to Martin Landau of "Ed Wood" (Martin. Landau); Best Supporting Actress is not Uma Thurman who can achieve "Pulp Fiction", nor Kirsten. Dunst who can achieve "Interview with the Vampire", "A Gan Zhengzhuan" Robin. Wright (Robin. Wright) and "Cloud Clothes Storm" Sophia-Loren (Sophia. Loren) also became spectators, "Bullets. Over. Broadway (Bullets. Over. Broadway)" for Dai Anna - West (Dianne. Wiest) won the award.
In addition, "Pulp Fiction" won the only major award, best screenplay, Quentin beat other competitors, including Hugo, to win the award, well deserved.
It is worth mentioning that in the competition for the best foreign language film, the two Chinese-language works "Alive" and "Eating and Drinking Men and Women" both lost, as well as "Blue, White and Red Trilogy Red" and "Queen Margot". They are all famous, and they all lost to Belgium's "Farinelli: il. Castrato". This is also a big cold.
On the whole, the 52nd Golden Globe Awards benefited from the accumulation of excellent works. It can be said to be very topical. Almost every important award is worthy of discussion, and the Golden Globe Awards are also very good at Tai Chi, and the most trophies are "Forrest Gump" and "The Lion King" each got three seats, and almost everyone who arrived at the scene had a share.
Behind the results of the Golden Globe Awards, people are once again upset for Hugo. Although it is said that Hugo met Tom Hanks of "Forrest Gump" this year, he is not without a fight. It is a pity that the Hollywood Foreign Press Association once again ignored Hugo's efforts. Hugo did not give any awards for his strong performance. So far, Hugo still has no record of winning at the Golden Globes.
People also think that, on the one hand, Hugo refused to attend the Golden Globes for two consecutive years, and on the other hand, the Golden Globes continued to ignore Hugo, which seemed to be an unsolvable problem. In an instant, the topic of whether Hugo will attend the Golden Globes next year caused a lot of noise, and many media paid attention.
However, before these topics were fermented, they were destroyed by a frontal attack by Hugo. Hugo relied on the Sundance Film Festival to steal all the glory of the Golden Globe Award. A shame, and it's no wonder that the media thought this was another wave of Hugo's revenge for the Golden Globes.
In the midst of this chaos, the "Chicago Tribune" began to speak sarcastically again, "Everyone is so sure that Hugo didn't attend the Golden Globes because of their hatred, not because of a certain woman?" This news is not. It has attracted too much attention. After all, there are too many topics recently, and everyone is too busy.
But the Chicago Tribune's point of view is interesting because they took note of the fact that Uma was at the Golden Globes for her Best Supporting Actress nomination for "Pulp Fiction," which was also last year's Cannes Film Festival. After that, Uma made her first official appearance. But in the end, no media gave her any space, as if she hadn't arrived at the scene at all.
In any case, Park City did steal most of the Golden Globes' glory, and the Golden Globes only lasted for one day - strictly speaking, not even a day, because on the 22nd, the "Los Angeles Times" Half of the focus has been given to the Sundance Film Festival. In addition, the "Los Angeles Times" also produced a special feature of the Sundance Film Festival in that day's newspaper, which was the first time that this independent film festival was truly widely known to people.
Under such circumstances, the craze for the Golden Globes only lasted for about a day and a half, and then the focus of news media coverage gradually moved closer to the Sundance Film Festival and to the fan culture, which really made the Hollywood Foreign Press Association feel aggrieved. Even if they want to change the status quo, there is nothing they can do: because this is the trend of society as a whole.
Lost the Ballon d'Or to a mere Hugo? It may sound incredible, but the stark contrast of facts is beyond doubt.
Relying on the powerful effect of Hugo, more and more eyes are focused on the Sundance Film Festival. The happiest person is Robert Redford, and the independent film practitioners are even happier than him, because They finally got a chance to stand in the spotlight.
Against this backdrop, "Before Sunrise" quietly landed at the Sundance Film Festival, making its debut in front of audiences.