Two Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty-One Intricate

The latest website: "Bang!"

The door of the projection room in the Lumiere Hall was slammed open, and a middle-aged reporter with a messy beard angrily appeared in front of everyone.

"Damn it! Self-righteous stupidity! Self-proclaimed cleverness is just showing off your own cleverness! I don't know what it is! It's just a pile of stinky horse dung! It should be thrown directly into the trash! Where is all that smart stuff going? Go? There's nothing but empty airs that don't make any sense! I bet he thinks he's very good at playing with the audience! If this goes on, he'll be finished sooner or later!"

Nagging and cursing, the middle-aged man swept through like a tornado, and the self-talk in his mouth never stopped. With someone blocking his way, he could roll up his sleeves at any moment and swing his fist into the other's jaw without ever a second of hesitation.

So, what exactly happened?

The audience and reporters gathered at the entrance of the Lumiere Hall all cast doubtful glances. No one dared to step forward to ask the other party what was going on, and then let a path and watched the reporter go away. , he was still muttering, "I can't believe I wasted a whole morning just for such a mess! If I knew it earlier, I would go to a kind of attention unit to search for secret treasures!"

Mess?

waste time?

Just a few words made the onlookers even more incomprehensible: Could it be that the "lobster" has collapsed?

Although the capacity of the Lumiere Hall was limited, and there were still many spectators who were not able to enter the venue for the first time, there were still a large number of curious spectators and reporters gathered outside the venue, eagerly looking forward to getting feedback on the scene as soon as possible. , the lively scene of the three floors inside and outside, even in Cannes, is definitely a rare sight - looking at the world, only Renly can have such a strong call.

However, the direction of things is a little confusing.

Indeed, everyone is complaining these days, it seems that every Renly film is released as a "fancy compliment meeting", critics and reporters are racking their brains to praise Renly, and the vocabulary of "best career" has developed To the point of vomiting, this situation is really annoying.

But from another perspective, even if Renly really encountered "Waterloo", the audience does not believe that the quality of Renly's works will be so bad. The brand effect of "Renly-Hall" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. The "detachment" of

Now it is also reviving among veteran fans.

So, I suddenly saw the reporter leaving the venue early and scolding me. That kind of psychological gap made the people who eat melons not very suitable. They should have been happy that "things are finally not the standard ending"; but the actual situation was confused, not at all Understand what's going on so that you can't be happy.

Could it be that... expectations are too high? So that a huge psychological gap was created, which led to bad reviews?

But no one can answer, because the people waiting at the door are poor children who can't watch the premiere, and now they can only look at each other, you look at me, I look at you, but don't know Lumiere Hall What happened here, the feeling of anxiety even surpassed the excitement and excitement of "Renly may be Waterloo".

Then...waiting and waiting, applause came intermittently from the Lumiere Hall, but it was neither warm nor violent, it seemed to be just a polite response; but slowly, the applause became louder and heavier, That enthusiasm is clearly captured even from the sidelines and continues to rise.

Not only did the question mark not get an answer, but there were more and more, and there were more and more speculations about the exchange of sights, and vaguely, the expectation value also became uneasy - such a scene is somewhat similar to the premiere of "Interstellar" Similar, but the feedback from "Lobster" is obviously clearer than that of "Interstellar".

At least, it ended with thunderous applause from the audience. But given the initial slamming and long silence, things get confusing.

Even after the show was over, the questions were still unanswered, and the first comments posted on Twitter could get a glimpse of the tip of the iceberg.

"Masterpiece! Ogus Lanthimos once again shows amazing talent! Renly Hall's extraordinary comedy performance is even more impressive!"

"It's a little regrettable that it stopped at a concept, but failed to deepen it further. Ogus Lanthimos was not able to really get a glimpse of the essence. Obviously, the movie still has more room for improvement and digging. The interesting opening finally settled in The confusion of the ending failed to achieve the effect.”

"With human relationships alluding to social class, Lanthimos's attempt to go a step further, once again leading to an astounding frenzy of reflection."

"The dramatic implant is still a little clumsy, and the setting of the start-up and turn-in is still not smooth enough. It can be clearly noticed that the alienation between the characters and the plot, Lanthimos can do better, and the overall effect is slightly inferior to 'Dog Tooth'; But the choice of Renly Hall and Rachel Weisz was a stroke of genius."

"Scenes, tones, transitions, and atmosphere, Yorgos Lanthimos has initially shown his master aura, a chilling but hilarious black comedy that is definitely on the big screen this year. The most unique viewing experience."

"The concept is great, the execution could be better."

"Best of the Year! From the script to the performance to the camera movement, and finally to the soundtrack and editing, it's perfect! It's natural!"

"I don't like it. It should be said that I can't like it - it's obviously a topic that can be more in-depth, but in the end it's nothing but marriage and love."

"Isn't it Renly Hall's best?"

debate.

debate.

Still arguing.

Different from the controversies caused by works such as "Transcendence", "Interstellar", and "Boom Drummer", it can be clearly seen that the comments of "Lobster" are more of a mixed feeling, a complex emotion between hate and liking. The neutral feeling between praise and criticism, the overall is somewhat moderate.

How should it be described?

That is to say, the emotions are not particularly extreme, not the difference between zero and one hundred, but the difference between sixty and eighty. This ambiguous viewing experience is actually a kind of harm to the movie, because this It also means that the emotion of watching the movie is not strong enough, and it will eventually become mediocre.

However, the problem is that "lobster" is far from mediocre. There are more things that can be captured in those words, but what is it, we can only wait for the audience to watch and dig in person.

However, Twitter is only Twitter after all, and those comments can only be used as a reference.

Every year at major film festivals, the voices on Twitter exclaiming "Masterpieces" early in the morning are endless. Just the main competition unit may see more than one "Masterpiece", and then create a kind of "Masterpiece". All the competition works are the illusion of the best candidates of the year, which made the audience who missed the chance to arrive at the scene couldn't help but be excited.

But what about the actual situation?

Only after the movie actually comes out will we know.

Immediately afterwards, the doors of the screening hall of the Lumiere Hall opened, and the audience attending the premiere finally appeared, and it was cathartic like a torrent.

"I think it's not just about love..."

"It's still about marriage."

"No no no, I mean, it's not just that, it's about the whole social order. Do you understand? I think short-sighted women represent the cunning ruling class..."

"You have overinterpreted, how can it be so deep?"

Men in twos and threes are exchanging opinions with each other, but no one can convince the other, everyone has their own opinions; not far away, groups of women are also expressing their own opinions. , but the perspective gives the film a different perspective.

"I think he's going to blind himself. It's about love versus the system, and David stands for love..."

"I have different opinions. I think this is a discussion about the laws of survival. David and myopic women represent two different ways of living..."

"What is this? Too far off track? There's no such thing at all. Love and marriage are the most obvious superficial topics, and I think the most important part of it right now is, let's say David goes blind, and Myopic women don't, so what does that mean?"

"Your interpretations are too deep, but I don't think Oggs has reached such a high level. This is also where I am disappointed with the movie. It can be better."

The chattering discussions held different viewpoints, but a group of people standing at the door of the Lumiere Hall showed another perspective.

"The shots, the editing, the soundtrack, these are really good. Oggs has made a lot of progress, and he's already a master at the beginning. I really like the whole tone."

"My favorite is the performance and the lines. In order to match the cool tone of Oggs, the actors are trying to restrain their performances as much as possible, and there are only two explosive scenes to be handled by Renly..."

"Yes, yes, one is the dance scene in the forest alone, and the other is the scene where the four eyes meet at the end. Renly handled these two scenes very cleverly. Personally, I like this kind of Renly more, Compared to 'Boom Drummer'."

"That's right, that's too Oscar. I think the scene of the solo dance in the forest can be interpreted in depth. That scene completely broke the overall balance, and Oggs's concepts and ideas may be hidden in it. But the viewing process is too involved. , I only noticed the shock, not able to savor it carefully."

"Well, I also think I watched it for the second time. Even the third time. I have to admit that the lines are very deep in my heart, have you noticed many details? Regarding David's ex-wife and brother, there are many details of the lines, You can dig well. I think the movie is more than what it looks like now.”

Argument, this is the absolute main theme, not pure like or hate, it seems that everyone can find the part that they like or dislike. This intricate look and feel has also become the main theme after the movie ends. In a short period of time, It's hard to come to a conclusion that discussion is the real major trend.