Chapter 3220 The Detective Is About to Die (Forty-Five)
Chapter 3194 Detective will die (forty -five)
"Then let's talk about Madeleine again." Schiller said: "I think you should see it, Madeleine is not a normal person. In fact, I am very doubtful. This seemingly pitiful woman is The real murderer of the tragedy of their family. "
Batman finally returned, because Schiller began to guess, so he asked, "Why are you so doubtful?"
"Because of that research notes."
Finally coming, Batman thought, and sure enough every Schiller could directly guess the truth through a ductive clue.
Hearing Schiller's mentioning his notes, Batman believed that he could only use psychoanalysis to get the conclusion that Madrine was a murderer.
Because there is no problem in that notes, it is not enough to judge a human personality evidence, but Schiller still said so, indicating that he might be empathy.
Unexpectedly, Schiller said: "According to my experience, when Madrine mentioned the encounter of her family, it was too indifferent. She may be a narcissistic spiritual pervert."
"Experience? What experience?"
"Some ... experience the experience of dealing with criminals." Schiller paused and then said, "I have seen a lot of similar murderers, and they all give me such a feeling."
"So is it a feeling?"
Schiller shook his head and said, "I just summarized. If you must pursue details, I can say that Madeleine's wording has a obvious perspective of God, macro and objective."
Schiller leaned back to the back of the chair and recalled: "Everyone lives in the first person, so when describing what they see, it must be subjective."
"For example, when the murderer is confessed to their criminal facts, they will conceal it. Some are to deliberately reduce the crime, but some are also unintentional."
"And some of these inadvertent conceals are because their brain beautifies themselves, and others are the difference in information brought about by subjective perspectives."
"They often say 'I see' or I think ', this is an obvious subjective way of narrative. For example,' I see him falling on the corner, and his face is full of blood. I wondered if he would be Dead '"
"This is some of the conferences I often hear. I think you should also hear it often, because although many murderers are cruel, they are normal, not lunatic and abnormal. This way of narrative should be available for normal people."
"And Madeleine is not. She described such a thing that" someone fell into the corner of the corner somewhere, and he was killed. "This is not a subjective narrative, but more like an objective judgment judgment. "" "
"If what she is talking about has nothing to do with her, maybe it can be explained, but she describes the death of her loved ones. Once the identity of her loved ones is substituted, you will find that this sentence is terrible."
"When anyone describes the death of her loved ones, she directly said, 'Mother fell to the corner of the kitchen, she was killed', 'sister lying on the table, her chest had a triangular hole', or her chest ', or 'My father lay down on the stairs, there are two blood stains above his arm'? "
"Perhaps Madeleine was very good later. She learned how to summarize one thing in the most concise words, but when she experienced all this, she was not older and the subjective consciousness was more likely to be affected by emotions, so she stayed in her memory. The picture should not be clear and objective like a autopsy report, even if she says a bunch of monsters, I feel more normally. "
"This proves that when Madeleine experienced all this, she did not emotional collapse because of fear. She didn't even feel fear. Can be clearly repeated.
"This is actually a very terrible thing. If this whole thing is not a calamity for her, how the possibility of becoming a survivor is because of luck?"
"In summary, I think that Madrine has mental disorders, and there is a big possibly a natural spiritual pervert. Of course, this tragedy is a evidence that she has no substantial evidence, but she is absolutely impossible As she described, she was a completely innocent victim. "
After listening to all this Batman, it found that this Schiller had a very keen insight and left aside from the analysis method. He was also a pretty good detective.
But Batman couldn't put aside the analysis method, because these conclusions had a brow after reading Madeleine's diary long ago. What he wanted was the deeper things behind this.
"Spiritual abnormal?" Batman asked, such things that involved professional psychological knowledge, may be able to attract Square's analysis of Madrine's personality.
But I did not expect that Schiller began to analyze the clown.
He introduced the difference between the Madrine and the clown as the introduction, and deeply demonstrated the difference between the spiritual perverts and the anti -social personality to Batman.
Many people say that the clown is a lunatic, but if it is specific, he is a person with anti -social personality disorder and belongs to the mental illness in a broad sense, but it is not a lunatic among the public cognition.
The reason was previously said that the clown was rational. All his actions were interest -oriented, but because the interests he pursued was very evil, he looked crazy.
The biggest difference between psychopaths and psychopaths is that they are not profit-oriented, but desire-oriented.
Let’s put it this way. Throughout history, many celebrities in the upper class have antisocial personality disorder, and even many people in modern times have admitted this.
The reason for this problem is that antisocial personality disorder is highly profit-oriented, even excessively profit-oriented, which means that they will do whatever it takes to achieve their own interests, ignore all social rules, ignore morality, and even ignore instincts and destroy humanity.
Although it is a bit cruel, it has to be admitted that this kind of character that does not recognize relatives is more likely to achieve success in the sociological sense.
It is not that upper-class people are more likely to suffer from antisocial personality disorder, but that antisocial personality disorder is more likely to become upper-class people.
But people often see psychopaths in the lower class.
Don’t think that psychopaths are crazy and go to the streets with knives to slash people. There are very few people who are serious to this extent, but mild psychopaths are widely present among the public.
One of their typical characteristics is that they harm others and do not benefit themselves.
This is exactly the opposite of the highly profit-oriented nature of antisocial personality disorder. Psychopaths do not pursue profit, and can even give up profit to satisfy their own desires.
For example, when a game is about to be won, teammates give up, group work is about to be completed, someone makes trouble, the project is going smoothly, and the person who makes trouble comes, the child has found a good job, and they must ruin it.
More importantly, these troublemakers are actually members of the team, which is commonly known as the insider.
Many people will think that such people are unreasonable, because it is obvious that this matter is developing in a good direction and is also beneficial to them.
If the game is won, they can get points, and if the group work is praised by the teacher, they will also benefit from it, but they have to make trouble, just like crazy, and their logic can't be figured out anyway.
But in fact, this is a manifestation of psychopathy.
If they win the game, they want to give up, not because they don't want to get points, but because they simply feel that they can't let their teammates be happy, or more accurately, they can't let their teammates be happier than me.
The group assignment is almost finished, and they want to make trouble. It's not that they are not afraid of being reprimanded by the teacher, but rather than being reprimanded by the teacher together, they don't want other students to have more weight in the teacher's heart than them.
Other things are similar, so this kind of psychopath has a prefix, called narcissism.
To be more specific, in order to prevent anyone from surpassing themselves in any aspect, they can sacrifice any interests to satisfy their perverted desires.
It is conceivable that such people cannot get along well.
Giving away some heads in the game or ruining a group assignment is indeed not a failure, but the key is that the symptoms of this kind of psychopath cannot be controlled freely. When they make key choices in life, they will also succumb to perverted desires and give up the benefits that are at their fingertips.
Losing a city today and a pond tomorrow, sooner or later you will give up your entire life.
If you observe this kind of people carefully, you will find that most of their real lives are failures.
Some of them may be able to disguise themselves for a while, but they will definitely make a few wrong key choices like crazy, making their ugly faces known to everyone, and then messing up their lives.
Many people may wonder why some people are not incapable or stupid, but they lose their minds at the critical moment of their lives, and they are declining all the way until they fall to the bottom, and they can't turn the situation around no matter how hard they struggle.
Most people think that they are unlucky, but in fact, they may be psychopaths who succumb to their abnormal desires and ignore their interests.
In Schiller's view, Madeleine's life trajectory is very consistent with this standard, probably ups and downs, until she died, she did not achieve the goals she set for herself.
If this character was made up by someone else, there is still a certain possibility of coincidence, but it was Greed who made up this character. He is a psychologist and is familiar with similar cases.
Another evidence that convinced Schiller that Madeleine had mental problems was that Greed was a very greedy person. He would not only seek profit when he could gain both fame and fortune.
He set himself up as a rich second-generation, which was not unexpected, but he made himself an unscrupulous capitalist who oppressed the lower class, which was actually inconsistent with his logic.
In the case where the background story can be set at will, he can set himself up as a wealthy and righteous person. Money is not completely linked to evil. If you can have all, why only one?
So Schiller firmly believes that there must be a reversal in the background story set by greed for himself, and the most difficult to whitewash is to not pay compensation to Madeline's family.
If this case does not meet the compensation standards in itself and is a fraud case deliberately designed by someone, then there is nothing wrong with what the Siltek Medical Insurance Company did, and greed will naturally be whitewashed.
The life experience written in Madeline's research notebook is naturally a foreshadowing of greed, and it can become strong evidence that Madeline is the villain at that time.
Schiller believes that as long as the notebook is sent to a professional mental appraisal agency for appraisal, it will definitely be concluded that Madeline is mentally abnormal, which is what greed did deliberately.
I can only say that it is fortunate that Bruce played the role of a psychologist in this story, and because of his amazing academic level, he failed to find out the wrong notes at the first time.
Others could not say anything even if they found out because of their professional differences, which allowed Greed to maintain the image of the villain.
At this time, Schiller suddenly realized that if Greed actually wanted to play a positive role, it would not work just by reversing the refusal to pay. In addition to whitewashing human experiments, he also had to give a reasonable explanation for inviting everyone to the laboratory, otherwise, wouldn't he still be a kidnapper?
If this is the inference, then Batman allowed others to be invited to the laboratory even though he knew all this. Did he guess that Greed was not actually going to do anything to them?
Schiller couldn't help but look at Batman again, thinking that he really deserves to be Batman.
:D