Chapter 495 Basic Deductive Method (Part 2)

Chapter 495 Basic deductive method (Part 2)

If you are a reader from Earth, you will definitely recognize such an opening chapter of "Sherlock Holmes":

This scene is a bit like the British drama "Sherlock".

That's right.

Lin Yuan referred to some Sherlock Holmes TV series.

The original book is not perfect, and Lin Yuan will definitely not adopt it completely. For example, Holmes made a wrong reasoning when he came across the speckled tape case.

This reasoning is based on the fact that snakes have hearing and drink milk, but in fact snakes have poor hearing and high latency, so the murderer's modus operandi is untenable, and snakes don't like milk.

But it's not the author's fault.

People in that era really didn't understand.

A similar situation also appeared in "Detective Poirot".

As a modern person, Lin Yuan would certainly not adopt the unscientific basis in the original novel because the author was limited by the constraints of the times.

And at this time.

Cao Dezhi couldn't wait to continue watching——

He was too curious how Holmes knew this information!

Fortune-telling is of course impossible.

If that's the case, then this novel should be misclassified by Chu Kuang.

Go out and turn left next door, there is a fantasy department.

Since it is a mystery novel, then Sherlock Holmes must have obtained the answer through reasoning!

What is the basis for inference?

With such curiosity, Cao Dezhi watched very carefully.

At this moment, he no longer subconsciously compared Holmes and Poirot.

Judging from the previous performance, Sherlock Holmes and Poirot, who are called great detectives by Chu Kuang, are completely different in terms of personality and way of speaking——

Holmes is too conceited!

In fact, Poirot is also very conceited, but how to describe Holmes's conceit?

This man even said swearingly:

Although others have witnessed various details with their own eyes, they still cannot solve some problems, and he, Holmes, can explain some difficult problems even if he stays at home——

You listen!

Is this a human language!

Poirot didn't even take you to pretend like that!

What's more, Holmes even called other London detectives worthless. He didn't even bother to call himself a detective, but called himself a "consulting detective"!

Um.

Detective consultant, this is a new profession invented by Holmes himself. He feels that he is the only person in Blue Star who does this job: [The police will find me whenever there is a problem that cannot be solved, and of course the detectives in London are the same. 】

Are you trying to say that others are detectives, but you are a detective?

And the only man in the entire Blue Star who made Sherlock Holmes understand what "humility" is turned out to be the dead Poirot.

Um.

Holmes only recognized Poirot's abilities.

When Cao Dezhi saw this passage, his mentality was slightly broken.

Boss Chu Kuang, can we stop playing like this?

You said that if you write Sherlock Holmes, you write Sherlock Holmes. Why do you still mention Poirot? Are you afraid that readers will not think that you have written Poirot to death?

It's all right if you mention Poirot.

You still let Holmes compare himself to Poirot?

Looking at Holmes' posture, it seemed that only Poirot in this world could compare with Holmes.

Crazy!

Although in the narration of the article, Holmes did not feel complacent at all, but said such words in a calm and slightly nostalgic tone, as if explaining a fact, but it is absolutely unforgivable for Poirot fans!

In the hearts of Poirot fans, no one can compare with it!

You wrote Sherlock Holmes so hung up at the beginning, aren't you afraid that it won't end?

This Sherlock Holmes is simply a king!

same.

Watson in the book also felt that Holmes was too pretentious.

This puts Watson on the same front as Cao Dezhi as a reader.

But Watson was quickly defeated by a piece of reasoning from Holmes:

["When we first met yesterday, I mentioned the Battle of Gerou, and you looked surprised."

"how do you know?"

Watson raised his voice: "Someone must have told you!"

"I don't know, I just observed."

Holmes' tone was as usual: "Your face is rather tanned, but your wrists are not, so you have been to the tropics, and you have not sunbathed. You can see the ability of a soldier, and the conversation you had with Mike when you entered the door showed that you had studied at Hanzhou Medical College like him, so it was obvious that you were a military doctor. You limped badly when you walked, but you would rather stand than sit down. , completely forgot about the disability, so at least part of the obstacle is psychogenic, and the place where you were injured was on the battlefield in the wild, so where is the battlefield where military doctors can be exposed and injured? Oh, it is the battlefield of Gerou.”]

Watson was stunned by this reasoning!

And Cao Dezhi, who thought he was on the same side with Watson at the moment, was also stunned. He never expected that Holmes would have seen through everything based on the first meeting with Watson!

Fuck!

What an amazing power of observation!

Poirot had a similar brainstorming moment, and it was just as brilliant, but Poirot's reasoning was definitely different than Holmes'.

Poirot seems to prefer to speculate on human nature.

Holmes, on the other hand, draws conclusions by observing countless details and summarizing information!

The former is mostly emotional, while Sherlock Holmes is rational!

This was the first time that Cao Dezhi felt that although Holmes had the potential to become a king, his brain was indeed working at an astonishing speed, but he still couldn't find a foothold to refute this reasoning...

Is this a coincidence?

It just so happened that Holmes found a clue?

of course not!

As Cao Dezhi continued to flip through the book with slightly shocked eyes, Holmes officially started his first reasoning show!

hair……

purse...

nail……

At the scene of the murder, he could infer countless information from the first deceased's sleeves, boots, trousers, knees, callus between thumb and index finger, expression before death, shirt cuffs, etc. !

Meticulous!

reason!

How complicated information can be summarized in his mind so that he can grasp key clues one by one. He can even draw conclusions about the number of people on the carriage from the traces of the carriage near the murder case, and even the depth of the indentation of the carriage!

Logical deduction?

not like this!

Logical deduction is the use of results to calculate the process, which is the field that Poirot is good at. Most detectives solve cases based on the result to derive the process, and logic accounts for a large proportion, but Holmes seems to be better at using the process to calculate the result. And these processes are the answers obtained through the various details mentioned above. The two have similarities, but they are different in nature!

can imagine.

When this reasoning show appeared in front of Cao Dezhi's eyes, Cao Dezhi's scalp was almost numb from the show. There seemed to be an image of a hook-nosed man wearing a bowler hat and holding a pipe in front of his eyes. His gaze should be There is an observational wisdom in rationality, and all reasoning is based on a theory of Sherlock Holmes:

elementary!

The case can be roughly divided into two parts. The first part is that Holmes uses the deductive method in his mouth to find the murderer of the serial murder case; It's a sympathetic murderer out for revenge in his own way.

The story is over.

Cao Dezhi was stunned.

This is the first time that Cao Dezhi, as a Blue Star, has faced the shock brought by Sherlock Holmes and the basic deductive method, and the same shocking feeling has also risen from the hearts of the editors in the next meeting room——

Scary Sherlock Holmes!

———————

ps: Don't dare to write too much detail, to prevent being sprayed too much, continue to update, the following is the leader's update link.