Chapter 332 Poirot Is on Fire

Chapter 332 Poirot is on fire

In fact, Leng Guang's reading speed is not fast, and he wasted a lot of time buying books.

The time he wasted was enough for the first batch of readers of "Murder on the Orient Express" to write a lot of book reviews and even ignite some topics.

In fact.

The real response starts from the comments given by the first batch of readers, and a reasoning forum becomes the first platform to explode online!

The reasoning forum is a gathering place for reasoning fans.

The number of hardcore reasoning fans is not low!

That is the expectation of readers who have not been disappointed by the content of "Murder on the Orient Express" after the Reasoning Association and Carter have confirmed each other; it is also the almost satisfied moan and groan of reasoning lovers after they get the ultimate satisfaction.

Swish Swish Swish!

Numerous posts have sprung up like mushrooms after rain!

Perhaps no one post can represent everyone's mood.

Everyone has different feelings, but everyone is shocked by this novel in the same way!

"I thought I was watching a traditional reasoning, Chu Kuang was writing a narrative, and was deceived twice in a row, this time I was thinking, no matter how traditional Chu Kuang's plot is, I believe it must be a gorgeous narrative Weird, I just knelt when I saw the ending...Chu Kuang really started to write traditional reasoning!"

This comment is highly praised!

Just like Lin Yuan planned.

His works can be narration or tradition, between fiction and reality, so that readers can't guess the answer until they see the end!

Likes and replies are also not low for subsequent posts.

"After reading this novel, I began to believe that "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling" is really Chu Kuang's ridicule and vigilance against Xu Wei, and then I suddenly felt a little sympathetic to Teacher Leng Guang, you have nothing to do with him..."

"This question is beyond the outline!"

"When Poirot revealed the truth in one breath, it is not an exaggeration to say that when he learned that the murderer killed the victim one by one, his eyes almost exploded. His scalp was really numb, and goosebumps arose! "

"Carter's preface didn't lie to me! It's a masterpiece! Blow it up!"

"Before I read it, I thought the score of the mystery novel was a little high. After reading it, I wondered, isn't this score really low? This is a textbook-level mystery novel, hey!"

"Polo Polo Polo! I love this pineapple!"

"Hahahaha Poirot's name appeared, maybe Chu Kuang wanted to eat pineapple at that time."

"Sorry, Chu Kuang is a god!"

"Sorry, I have a prejudice against Chu Kuang because of the narration. After reading this new work, I am completely convinced, and the ending is very healing. I have always hoped that in this dirty world, in corners where the law cannot or does not want to shine, there will be an invisible Hands raised the sword of judgment, such as these twelve so-called murderers, when I saw Poirot's decision and the last few lines, I felt extremely warm in my heart. Although I can't do anything, I am an insignificant fellow, I I am still willing to use my trivial five-star evaluation to express my respect for this behavior and this understanding."

"The victim was the perpetrator, twelve victims... It was shocking, and after the final turn, Poirot was so handsome! The battle song was already playing in my mind! It's a pity that BGM always feels that Poirot is not good enough."

"2333, Chu Kuang has Xianyu, let Xianyu write the song."

"Poirot is the first detective in the history of reasoning to let a prisoner go. At least this is the first time I have seen this way of writing... Maybe this will be controversial, but I want to say to Chu Kuang, well done!"

"..."

In the post, people repeatedly mention Polo.

Poirot's decision made everyone discuss it repeatedly.

Someone cut out the text in the novel. When Poirot gave two choices, he said:

【Everything is either right or wrong, and you...】

He was silent for a long time before he said this sentence in confusion: [I can't make a judgment. 】

He left it to others to choose.

And when everyone chose the first conclusion, the murderer was not guilty, Poirot took off his hat, bowed, announced that he was withdrawing from the case, and turned away slowly in the snow.

What is good and what is evil?

This is the first time that Poirot can't tell the difference, but he has fascinated countless readers!

Everyone seems to see the lonely figure walking in the snow, thinking while walking...

In fact, readers who have read "Roger's Mystery" know very well how proud and principled Poirot is.

Everyone is used to Poirot's wisdom and judgment!

Getting him to say "I can't judge" is incredible.

Like he ended up getting out of the case.

Because it is incredible, readers can empathize with Poirot's torment and choice!

At this moment, Poirot has become a great detective recognized by countless people!

You should know that "the world-famous great detective" is the setting given to Poirot by the author of the novel.

The author's pen can be freely set in the novel, such as the most handsome man in the world, the most beautiful woman in the world, etc.

Third-rate writers set their own self-obscenity.

Top-notch writers, as soon as the story and setting come out, the readers collectively climax, as if there is such a person.

This is called pen power.

So it is not an easy task for readers to admit that "Poirot is a world-renowned detective", but Chu Kuang did it with ease——

Two novels are enough.

The foundation and foreshadowing were laid with "Roger's Mystery".

Use "Murder on the Orient Express" to open up word of mouth and awareness.

Poirot's story may continue in the future, but at this moment, Poirot, the famous detective who let the murderer go, has already ushered in a big hit in the readers' minds!

certainly.

Puzzle lovers are also catered for, as this comment puts it:

"I will never guess the tricks of the old thief Chu Kuang! The most hateful thing is that the old thief Chu Kuang swears to give out extremely complicated settings, and even lists the sketches of the carriages and the action schedule of the characters. After racking my brains to fill a sheet of paper, I suddenly threw out his newly invented impossible crime mode!!"

Yes.

Many readers try to find out the truth one step ahead of the detective when they read "Murder on the Orient Express", which is a great hobby for reasoning lovers to read such books.

But when everyone saw the ending, while shocked, they were all dumbfounded.

Did you commit a foul?

Chu Kuang actually completed a new reasoning mode!

There were twelve murderers!

Of course, "unexpectedly", all the passengers in the car ganged up to commit crimes, helped each other cover up, and provided alibi, which directly led to the possibility that all the testimony may be false.

Who would have imagined this! ?

Isn't there only one murderer in the normal way of thinking?

Occasionally, there are only two or three people who commit crimes in partnership, right?

But in this novel, all conventional reasoning methods are wrong, and the ending is completely wrong! member! good! people!

At the same time, all! member! fierce! hand!

This is the same as watching Xu Gui for the first time, and you can't guess the murderer no matter what, Chu Kuang's "Murder on the Orient Express", this is another brand new reasoning mode!

Basically impossible to guess!

So after reading it, it’s hard not to be confused!

Not to mention, until the answer was revealed, everyone instinctively thought that what Chu Kuang wrote was Xu Gui.

The media gimmicks are out.

The literary battle between Chu Kuang and Leng Guang, the duel between narration and tradition.

As a result, as soon as Chu Kuang's new book came out, everyone saw the head and realized, ah, this guy is sincerely teasing us. He is the same as Leng Guang's writing this time, and belongs to the category of traditional reasoning!

Even the mode of killing people in the secret room is almost the same!

"I feel that Chu Kuang is really the writer who can play tricks on readers the most, but I am happy to be teased."

"Chu Kuang created narration, but Chu Kuang never said that he can only narrate. When I found out that this is a traditional reasoning, and at the same time it almost subverts the traditional reasoning mode, I will be dumbfounded!"

"As expected of an old thief."

"The old thief is playing with our feelings crazily! He must be hiding somewhere and laughing!"

"The one who was played the worst was obviously Leng Guang, who pulled Chu Kuang to a duel, but Chu Kuang defeated Leng Guang with the traditional reasoning that Leng Guang is best at."

"This is equivalent to Chu Kuang defeating Leng Guang with the martial arts that Leng Guang is best at, which is a bit embarrassing."

"I feel sorry for Leng Guang. Although this guy likes to slander, he doesn't just open his mouth. His slander is basically well-founded. This time he ran into Chu Kuang, it was really bad luck."

"Chu Kuang also slapped the anti-narrative readers in the face. When "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falls" came out, didn't many people complain that Chu Kuang would be a narrator, and voted for the second one, wanting to pull Chu Kuang off the horse. , As a result, Chu Kuang now tells everyone clearly: Brother's traditional reasoning is even better than Xu Gui's."

"..."

This time it is not brain supplement and over-interpretation.

Lin Yuan really thought this way.

He doesn't want to give everyone the impression that he can only tell tricks.

Therefore, traditional reasoning must be used this time, and it must be a work that is explosive enough.

Now, this work really exploded!

Traditional reasoning can also be used to bring forth the new, and write a killing mode in which all members cooperate!

What a trick within a trick!

It directly swollen the faces of those reasoning fans who disdained Chu Kuang before.

Just like what some readers commented, who would have thought that Chu Kuang's traditional reasoning is better than Xu Gui's!

Those who voted black for Chu Kuang before counted as one, and they were collectively punished to stand in front of "Murder on the Orient Express".

And the aftermath of this explosion not only shocked the readers, but also shocked countless authors in the reasoning circle...

You must know that reasoning writers are the group of people who are most sensitive to reasoning novels.

Readers are just admiring the ingenuity of this story, but the reasoning writers clearly understand how difficult it is to create such a story!

"Chu Kuang is too monstrous!"

On this day, after reading "Murder on the Orient Express", someone in a group of reasoning writers said this with emotion.

In the group, all are +1.

Cough, I accidentally wrote a chaotic chapter, and it has been revised. There should be another chapter during the day, because I am going to the hospital to visit my grandfather this afternoon, and I probably don’t have time to type, so I stayed up late to write this chapter.