Writing a Story Is Ultimately About Writing About People

Actually, I was ready to be scolded yesterday.

Because everyone has their own moral concepts and reading comprehension. The part involving moral choices will definitely cause controversy.

On one hand, there will be readers who empathize with Fang Heling and think that Jiang Wang is too arrogant. (Probably similar to... Haven't you killed anyone? Why are you pretending?)

On the other hand, there will be readers who hate Fang Heling and question why Jiang Wang gave him the opportunity to kill Zhang Linchuan together in the end. (Probably similar to... Is it clean?)

This kind of questioning is bound to appear.

I did my best and pulled out all my hair, trying to strike a balance, but both sides are flowing, how can I not get wet at all?

So I deleted and revised it several times, and I was not sure whether I should write it. (I can give myself a day off if I have this time. I can't remember when I last rested...)

The reason why I still write like this and do this kind of work that may be thankless is just because at this moment, Wang Changji, Fang Heling and Jiang Wang are bound to meet, and there must be a certain collision of ideas.

Writing a story is ultimately about writing people.

Compared to passing it over and being vague, and not offending anyone, I think it is a more responsible writing attitude to directly dissect it and ask others and myself.

It is also the best presentation of what I think in my heart.

I dedicate what I think is "the best" to you.

It must also be admitted that it first satisfies my own pursuit of the story.

Thank you for your tolerance.

Thank you for the readers who have always supported me, allowing me to be a little willful, write the stories I want to write, and say what I want to say.

At the same time, I want to say that since I have already thought about the controversy before writing, and I have decided to write it this way, then the controversy is something I should face.

I just hope that readers who question it will not directly scold the author or the book. After all, whether the work is attentive or not can be read. After all, Fang Heling is just one of too many characters in this world.

You can question, and questioning is right.

As long as there is no personal attack, questioning is innocent.

I hope that readers who like this chapter will not respond excessively.

Everyone has their own understanding and ideas, and it is normal to have conflicts.

When we eat tofu pudding, we have to choose between salty and sweet, let alone other things?

Keeping your restraint and expressing your opinions within the appropriate scope is a kind of decency.

The reason why I don’t talk about these in this chapter, but open a separate chapter.

Because this kind of discussion may spread to many platforms.

I saw it in the book review area of ​​Qidian. I can also make appropriate rules, but I can’t see it anywhere else.

I can only say it here.

I really, really don’t want sincere readers to quarrel or even abuse each other because of this.

Debate is interesting.

Abuse is degrading.

I often read this chapter and appreciate the collision of different ideas of thousands of readers.

I often frown because of personal attacks.

Gathering is fate, coming and going is choice, please be decent.

Because I still have to write updates, this essay is written sloppily, there may be omissions and differences, please tolerate it.

I hope everyone will receive my "hope".

Still the same sentence -

"Reading is a happy thing, don't make yourself unhappy."

-Why is it so, written on the morning of the 24th.