1422 Chapter 1422
No one is satisfied with the Golden Globes winners list - other than the winners, not just because the expected winners didn't show up, but because the Golden Globes cake-splitting technique is so bad, It makes people feel weak, and the awards of the six major acting departments are completely out of order. The only thing that is a little more reliable is the title of Nicolas Cage's drama actor, at least in terms of performance completion and relative strength. It deserves its name, but in the context of the entire list of winners, it makes people laugh and cry.
Now people have started a heated discussion, at this year's Oscars, will Hugo, who once again attacked the actor's golden statuette, lose to Nicholas? If this is the case, then this entanglement is really unclear. More importantly, this possibility is very large.
Nicholas's deep and heavy performance in "Away from Las Vegas" did win a lot of praise. When the film was released at the end of October, many people believed that it was likely to bring him an Oscar winner statuette. At that time, "Seven Deadly Sins" was being shown, but Hugo's Anonymous was definitely impacting the supporting roles, which would not be a threat to Nicholas, and the legendary "Death Ramble" had not yet been opened, so Nicholas deservedly became the No. 1 candidate for the best actor. .
Even after the release of "Death Row", it is generally believed that Nicholas and Hugo are on a par, although from a technical point of view, Hugo has the upper hand; Feeling the power of the character, even if it is a true performance, should be praised, so in terms of character completion, Nicholas is indeed no worse than Hugo.
Now, the Golden Globes have given their answer, choosing to support Nicholas and give Hugo a satirical best actor in a musical or comedy, which makes the Oscars two months later even more unpredictable .
US Weekly's aggressive headline "Ugly Results" apparently wasn't just because of Hugo alone.
In the competition for the best screenwriter, Hugo, who played "Before Sunrise", lost again to Emma Thompson, who wrote "Sense and Sensibility", and also "Death Ramble". Tim Robbins and "Pocahontas" Aaron Sorkin.
What does this mean? It means that Hugo, who was very popular in the nomination stage, finally won a no-nonsense best actor in a musical or comedy just by relying on "Before the Sunrise", and "Seven Deadly Sins" and "Death Row Walk" returned empty-handed.
Should this be celebrated or not? Charlize Theron, the co-star who accepted the award on behalf of Hugo at the Golden Globes, didn't say anything about the acceptance speech, but simply said "thank you" and it was a hasty thing. This is because Charlize was accepting it on behalf of him. Human relationships, or Hugo's true attitude?
No one knows if the Ballon d'Or finalists are directly linked to Hugo's absence - and if so, there's no evidence, but there's no doubt about a future relationship between Hugo and the Ballon d'Or It's starting to get more and more interesting, will Hugo be at the Golden Globes next year?
And no matter what happens next year, at least this year, the news media will not let go of the Golden Globes easily. The remarks of "US Weekly" have won the support of countless media reporters.
Of course, the media reporters didn't fight for Hugo alone - they were not so friendly, but because the Golden Globe Awards in the acting department were too bizarre, which made the Hollywood Foreign Press Association almost caught in a situation that everyone refers to. .
"From 'Scent and Knowing a Woman' to 'The Righteous Sea', from 'Sleepless in Seattle' to 'Schindler's List', from 'Pulp Fiction' to 'Before the Sunrise', from 'Seven Deadly Sins' to ' "Dead Man's Walk", Hugo Lancaster has dedicated eight absolute masterpieces in the past four years. In these works, he has created characters with different personalities and distinct images. With delicate and restrained yet explosive performances, Created one classic image after another on the screen.
Especially last year, Hugo's acting skills ushered in a full-scale explosion. Jesse, who is chic and casual but gentle and slender, Anonymous who is calm and elegant but cruel and bloody, and Matthew, who is violent and cruel but fragile and painful, Hugo has injected into the three roles. The irreplaceable soul, let these characters walk out of the screen, come to our side, and tell the true stories.
Maybe it's too early to discuss Hugo's place in film history, but there's no doubt that Hugo is one of the best actors of our time, especially considering he's only twenty-eight years old At his age, this report card is terrifying.
It's hard to imagine that eight completely different films, eight characters with different styles, and eight wonderful performances only brought Hugo a Golden Globe Award for Best Actor in a Musical Comedy, not a 'death row' "Wander" that baptizes the soul is not the acting that makes the soul tremble in "The Seven Deadly Sins", it's just the best actor in a musical comedy.
This is Hugo's final report card after four years of Golden Globe nominations and eight nominations.
Such an ugly result has made all language lose its color, we just need to quietly look at this list of winners, and then make our own judgments in our hearts.
I can't help but start thinking: maybe Hugo made the right choice. "
This report from "US Weekly" is undoubtedly sharp and pointed all the blame at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, but this report with extreme views is irrefutable. Indeed, perhaps purely from the roles played by Nicholas and Hugo, the award for "Away from Las Vegas" is the least controversial award in the six acting departments, and even "US Weekly" did not ridicule Nicholas-because they Knowing that this is due to the strength of Nicholas.
But the awarding of any award is not so simple. Take the Oscars as an example. In addition to the actor's strength, the actor's contribution to Hollywood is also a major factor. In other words, it is a "guilt ticket", such as Jeff Bridges. Was Jeff. Bridges' 2009 performance in "Crazy. Heart" the best performance of his career? Obviously not. Jeff had already won four Oscar nominations for acting, but got nothing, so in that year he beat out the better performers Colin. Firth and Morgan Free Mann, won his first statuette.
From this point of view, it is really indignant that Hugo has been nominated for eight Golden Globe Awards in four years but only got such a result. This can definitely be called an insult to Hugo by the Golden Globe Awards.
Therefore, the report of "US Weekly" not only did not cause an uproar of controversy and crusade, but also won the support and applause of the media colleagues.
In addition to Hugo, the other names on the list of winners also made people complain.
"Sharon Stone beat Susan Sarandon, Meryl Streep and Emma Thompson with acting skills, well, it's a catchy headline." This is from "Chicago Tribune" The headline of the report was full of black humor. Indeed, no matter it is placed in any period of history, such a title has a strong satirical effect, even if people agree that the performance in "Las Vegas" is the best performance of Sharon's career, but a prefix must be added - career The only good show, and it was even more eclipsed by the competition.
"Who is Mira Sorvino? Also, Woody Allen has a new work?" This is the news of the winner of the best supporting actress in "Variety" magazine. On the newcomer, Kate Winslet is in The stunning performance in "Sense and Sensibility" has aroused countless discussions. As for senior actors, Anjelica Huston, who has been nominated for Oscar three times and won the Best Supporting Actress in 1985, still performed brilliantly this time. Mira's standout is puzzling -- of course, when Woody's name is written in the director and writer column, it might explain the situation.
"The battle between reason and emotion, and emotion wins in the end." This wise news report comes from The Hollywood Reporter, the most professional magazine in the industry, said in the press release:
"The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which has always played Tai Chi incomparably skillfully, once again presented a perfect performance, two best films, best director, six acting departments, best screenplay and other ten awards, the only thing that overlaps is Winning 'Sense and Sensibility' for Best Picture in a Drama Series and Best Screenplay, ten trophies for each of nine films, it was definitely a night of big wins for everything.
But this time the performance of the Golden Globes is probably going to fail.
'Sense and Sensibility', which won Best Picture in a Drama Series, 'Baby Pig', which won Best Picture in a Musical Comedy, and 'Braveheart', who won Best Director The core theme, the filming techniques used by the director, and the ideas shown by the characters in the story are all different styles, but the Golden Globe Award awarded these three works at the same time, which shows the broad-mindedness of the Golden Globe Award, but also reflects The uncertainty of the Golden Globe Award for the awarding ideas and concepts.
When the Golden Globes thought that it had successfully held a feast for the whole people's carnival, it had lost the core of the awards ceremony in the spotlight and evolved into a bustling puppet show: the cheers were extremely enthusiastic, but the on-stage But just a puppet without a soul.
Looking at the entire list of winners, the only winner was Sense and Sensibility, and they won two. This is lost and sad for an awards ceremony. "
Generally speaking, there will be a winner at the awards ceremony, and at least three trophies will be recorded, otherwise it will only appear difficult to convince the public - the winner of the best picture has only received an additional affirmation? Does that mean that the so-called best picture isn't that good either, and that it's the same quality as the others?
Therefore, the "Hollywood Reporter" pointed out the greed and missteps of the Golden Globe Awards, not to mention the six major acting departments that have become a laughing stock.
The 53rd Golden Globe Awards has come to an end, but such a result makes it difficult to rejoice.