Chapter 1306 Theology and Science
It's a pity that they didn't code it well. The two people have never been able to reach an agreement on this issue. Although the bespectacled man Du Fei tried hard to elaborate and explain to Dr. Gallo a very novel world view extended from religious existence, Gallo may have been unable to reach an agreement on this issue. The doctor was too "stupid" and ultimately failed to fully understand its deeper meaning.
If it were those people in the past, the man with glasses might think that those people were hopelessly stupid and failed to live up to his expectations of his colleagues, but that would be fatal. Dr. Gallo made it clear: Regarding the same question, choosing a does not mean The representative does not accept or deny option b at all, but has different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrödinger’s Cat] is close to theology. It proposes that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world. However, this is not an idealist view that science strongly denies. But the problem is that Schrödinger’s Cat is still It really tortured countless scientists to the point of ecstasy.
"I'm glad to know what you have to say about religion. If, as you said, religion is all about writing good scripts. Then how do you explain science? I believe in science, and science can prove it."
This is another nonsense. For scientists, their lifelong belief is to find the most amazing things, science, the ultimate truth, and all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo, you said you believe in science. What do you mean by this? Do you mean you believe in a certain scientific conclusion?"
"I believe not only in scientific conclusions, I believe in everything scientific." Dr. Gallo replied immediately.
"I think you should understand that any scientific research has basic premises, which scientists call axioms."
Having said this, Dr. Gallo suddenly thought of infinite energy technology. Is there any axiom for studying infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or postulates.
"As the best scientist, you should naturally understand this premise. Even if you don't know, it doesn't matter. Let me review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. Starting from this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived and the entire theoretical system is established. "
Dr. Gallo curled his lips. He naturally knew this. Classical physics assumes that space and time are uniform. This is a postulate that cannot be proved in itself.
For another example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. This assumption cannot even be proven by the proposer himself, but without this assumption, he would not be able to develop his own theory.
"This is like saying that 1+1=2 is a postulate of mathematics, but no one can prove that 1+1=2. If you want to use the entire mathematical system, you can only accept this postulate. In other words, you can only believe in 1 +1=2.”
Dr. Gallo nodded. It couldn't be simpler. Who said 1+1=2 cannot be proved?
I give you an apple first, and then I give you another apple. Don’t you have two apples?
"But induction is used here, the basic method of scientific research. This experiment can be done many times, but strictly speaking it cannot prove anything. How many experiments do we have to do before we know that these experiments are not special cases? Even if it is repeated many times , how do we know that we are not overgeneralizing? If we saw the sun rising in the east every day, can we guarantee that it will rise in the east in the future?”
Just as house prices around the world have been rising, can it be guaranteed that they will continue to rise forever?
"You mean that this kind of logical dilemma arises because induction itself cannot be proven. Scientists can only choose to believe in it and use it. Otherwise, even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out." Dr. Gallo found it very interesting. It's not like he hasn't thought about similar issues before, but he quickly moved on to other things.
Du Fei, the man with eyes, rubbed his eyes. It was not easy to finally have someone with whom he could have an academic discussion.
He said: Not only induction, but also causation, another basic tool of scientific research, cannot be proven. "
"Causation rate??"
"Well, I have always questioned the causality rate: for example, when the sun shines on a stone, the stone becomes hot, so people say that the sun is the cause and the stone becomes hot is the result, but I think these people only see two isolated There is no causal connection between phenomena. Who can prove that this connection exists objectively and does not only exist in people’s minds.”
Dr. Gallo said resolutely: "Wait a minute, if you want to question it based on your logic, I'm afraid no one can answer it directly from ancient times to the present."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to point out that the causality rate may be people's subjective imagination. You are really an idealist. No wonder the Royal Society of Science wants to kick you out. You have been deviant from the beginning." Dr. Gallo is a smart person after all. He won't be able to figure out his thinking.
Unfortunately, the two people have never been able to reach an agreement on this issue. Although the bespectacled man Du Fei tried his best to elaborate and explain to Dr. Gallo a very novel world view extended from religious existence, Dr. Gallo may have been too " "Stupid", and ultimately failed to fully understand its deep connotation.
If it were those people in the past, the man with glasses might think that those people were hopelessly stupid and failed to live up to his expectations of his colleagues, but that would be fatal. Dr. Gallo made it clear: Regarding the same question, choosing a does not mean The representative does not accept or deny option b at all, but has different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrödinger's cat] is close to theology. It proposes that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world, but this is not an idealistic view that science strongly denies. But the problem is that Schrödinger's cat really tortured countless scientists to death.
"I'm glad to know your views on religion. If, as you said, religion is all for a written script. Then how do you explain science? I believe in science, and science can be proven."
This is another nonsense. For scientists, their lifelong belief is to find the most amazing things, science, the ultimate truth, all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo. You said you believe in science. What does that mean? Do you mean you believe in a certain scientific conclusion?"
"I believe that it's not just Ke Ran who thought of infinite energy technology. Is there an axiom in studying infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or postulates.
"As the best scientist, you should understand this premise. Even if you don't know it, it doesn't matter. Let me review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. Starting from this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived to establish the entire theoretical system." Good-looking novel network
Dr. Gallo curled his lips. He naturally knew these. Classical physics assumes that space and time are uniform. This is an assumption that cannot be proved by itself.
For example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. Even the proposer himself cannot prove this assumption, but without this assumption, he cannot develop his own theory.
"It's like saying that 1+1=2 is a mathematical postulate, but no one can prove 1+1=2. If you want to use the entire mathematical system, you can only accept this postulate. In other words, you can only believe that 1+1=2. "
Dr. Gallo nodded. It's the simplest thing. Who said that 1+1=2 can't be proved?
I give you an apple first, and then another apple. Don't you have two apples?
"But here we use the test to know that these experiments are not special cases? Even if we repeat them many times, how do we know that we are not generalizing? In the past, we saw the sun rise from the east every day. Does it guarantee that it will rise from the east in the future? "
Just like the house prices all over the world have been rising, can it guarantee that it will rise forever?
"You mean that this logical dilemma arises because induction itself cannot be proved. Scientists can only choose to believe it and use it, otherwise even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out. "Dr. Gallo thought it was very interesting. He had thought about similar topics before, but he quickly went to do other things.
The bespectacled man Du Fei rubbed his eyes. Finally, someone could have an academic discussion with him. It was not easy.
He said: Not only induction, but also another basic tool of scientific research, causality, cannot be proved."
"Causality?"
"Well, I have always doubted causality: for example, the sun shines on the stone, and the stone becomes hot, so people say that the sun is the cause and the stone becomes hot as the result, but I think these people only see two isolated phenomena and cannot see the causal relationship between them. Who can prove that this relationship exists objectively, rather than just in people's minds?"
Dr. Gallo said resolutely: "Wait a minute, if you want to question it according to your logic, I am afraid that no one from ancient times to the present can give a positive answer."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to fail Reaching a consensus on this issue, although the bespectacled man Du Fei tried to explain to Dr. Gallo the novel worldview extended from the existence of religion, Dr. Gallo might be too "dull" and finally failed to fully understand its deep connotation.
If it were those people in the past, the bespectacled man might think that those people were hopelessly stupid and failed his expectations of his fellow believers, but Dr. Gallo made it clear that: Regarding the same question, choosing a does not mean completely rejecting and denying option b, but there are different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrödinger's cat] is already close to theology. It proposes that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world, but this is not the idealist view that science strongly denies, but the problem is that Schrödinger's cat really tortured countless scientists to death.
"I'm glad to know some of your statements about religion. If, as you said, religion is all for a written script. Then how do you explain science? Compared to scientists, their lifelong belief is to find the most amazing things, science, the ultimate truth, all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo. You said you believe in science. What does that mean? Do you mean you believe in a certain scientific conclusion?"
"I believe not only in scientific conclusions, but in everything scientific." Dr. Gallo answered immediately.
"I think you should understand that any scientific research has basic premises, which scientists call axioms."
At this point, Dr. Gallo suddenly thought of infinite energy technology. Is there also axioms in the study of infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or postulates.
"As the best scientist, you should understand this premise. Even if you don't know it, it doesn't matter. Let me review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. Starting from this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived to establish the entire theoretical system."
Dr. Gallo curled his lips. He knew these things. Classical physics assumes that time and space are uniform. This is an assumption that cannot be proved by itself.
For example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. Even the proposer himself cannot prove this assumption, but without this assumption, he cannot develop his own theory.
"It's like saying that 1+1=2 is a mathematical assumption, but no one can prove 1+1=2. If you want to use the entire mathematical system, you can only accept this result. If you are given another apple, you will have two apples, right?
"But here we use induction, the basic method of scientific research. This experiment can be done many times, but strictly speaking, it cannot prove anything. How many experiments do we have to do to know that these experiments are not special cases? Even if we repeat them many times, how do we know that we are not generalizing? Just because we saw the sun rise from the east every day before, does that guarantee that it will continue to rise from the east in the future? "
Just like the fact that house prices have been rising all over the world, does that guarantee that they will continue to rise forever?
"You mean that this logical dilemma arises because induction itself cannot be proven, and scientists can only choose to believe in it and use it, otherwise even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out. "Dr. Gallo thought it was very interesting. He had thought about similar topics before, but he quickly went to do other things.
The bespectacled man Du Fei rubbed his eyes. Finally, someone could have an academic discussion with him. It was not easy. But I think these people only see two isolated phenomena and cannot see the causal relationship between them. Who can prove that this relationship exists objectively, rather than just in people's minds?"
Dr. Gallo said resolutely: "Wait a minute, if you want to question it according to your logic, I'm afraid no one has been able to answer it directly from ancient times to the present."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to point out that the causal rate may be a subjective imagination of people. You are really an idealist. No wonder the Royal Society of Science wants to expel you. You have been a heretic from the beginning." After all, Dr. Gallo is a smart man, so how could he not understand his thoughts.